While hyperlinks are static links contained in documents, web navigations are dynamic, being based on people’s online behavior. In addition to being useful for studying the structure of a document collection, navigation data can be used to study people’s online activities. Navigation patterns can be studied for either an individual or a group. Navigation patterns can also be studied for certain periods of time, over which trends can be identified.
From an analysis perspective, both hyperlinks and navigations can be represented by link matrices with outgoing/start documents as rows and incoming/destination document as columns. In hyperlink analysis, the values in the matrix are either 0 or 1, as two documents are either linked or unlinked. In navigation analysis, links between documents are weighted by the frequency of navigation. In this sense, navigation data are richer than hyperlinks.
Por otro lado, y al igual que sucedió en el cuantitativo online, veremos cómo crece el pull de empresas proveedoras de servicios cualitativos. Pensamos en plataformas desarrolladas de forma específica para la investigación y que vayan más allá de las funcionalidades diseñadas desde cliente.
Y, por último, desde la academia y desde la empresa se abre un reto para trabajar en la fundamentación teórica de estas metodologías. Un reto para el que este artículo espera ser un pequeño grano de arena.
El desplazamiento de los perfiles, los roles o papeles sociales se puede llegar a considerar acelerado y en parte debido a la inmersión tecnológica. Pero llevamos décadas de renovación institucional y un creciente roce e hibridación de culturas contemporáneas que las prácticas digitales confirman y amplifican. Hasta la misma renovación universitaria del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior sólo es posible con un incremento de la tecnificación educativa. Universalizar un sistema de formación por competencias implica aceptar la transformación de las profesiones y acondicionar el sistema formativo para seguir sus cambios. El aprendizaje realza el protagonismo del que aprende. ¿No es posible que nos encontremos en un proceso paralelo o parecido de
renovación de la investigación de sus instituciones de las revistas académicas y de sus grupos departamentales?
The authors have located definitions of “discourse” used in previous studies within two spheres. First, “discourse” as a noun, “a thing in and of itself.” For instance, “discourse as text, discourse as language-in-use, discourse as identity and discourse as truth, rationality and common sense.”
Alternatively and less prominently, “discourse” is used as a verb, primarily to “challenge actions that people and institutions take in response to each other and more specifically, actions done with language and other semiotic systems in order to create, recreate, change and maintain identities, roles and social contexts that people live within (and without).” (…)
A seminal idea introduced in On Discourse Analysis in Classrooms is the notion of “laminating,” the integration and layering-in of definitions and insights from other studies. “A lamination bonds together a series of layers in such a way that each remains unrecognizable but together may be stronger and put to new uses.” While maintaining the integrity of the individual study, the lamination process allows for the emergence of something new as a result of how the studies inform each other. (…)
“Discourse analysis is less a methodology than a set of ways of ‘seeing’ language and literacy events in classrooms.” The authors identify four frames that are essential building blocks in discourse analysis studies:
+ The linguistic turn in social sciences
+The foregrounding of local events and their relationships to broader cultural and social processes (i.e. micro- and macro-level approaches)
+ Recognition of the importance of social and historical contexts
+ Recognition that discourse processes always involve power relations.
Lo que sigue a continuación es el pequeño puñado de cosas que he ido aprendiendo a lo largo de los años mientras me pateaba los archivos del PubMed, IEEEXplore, Google Scholar (que es utilísimo en ocasiones) y otras bases de datos. He pensado que merece la pena compartir estas pequeñas…
(Fuente: infovis.lacoctelera.net)
In addition, the analysis would have to take interactivity into account, not only as a matter of principle, so as to do justice to the rich affordances of the medium, but also because of the social significance that the exploitation of these affordances may have for a particular social practice. In the case of the government’s ‘benefit fraud’ campaign, for example, visitors to the website are encouraged to ‘report a cheat’ by filling in a detailed online form. The interactive potential of the medium is thus harnessed to what seems like an invidious perversion of e-government.
Furthermore, the unique semiotic potential of the web creates new challenges for the analysis of multimodality (Lemke, 2002). To return briefly to my earlier snapshots of higher education discourse, universities can now be seen to use not only colourful graphics on their websites, but also sound and movement.
(…)
The methodological challenge involved is compounded when it is not only the multimodality of web communication itself that is at issue, but its complex links with other media. This is the case with the world-wide cross-media franchises discussed by Lemke (2004), who proposes to extend CDA in the direction of a ‘multiplicative, heteroglossic model of meaning effects across media’.
Clearly, web technology has significantly extended the discursive repertoire available, allowing new modes of representation as well as the construction of new identities and relationships in ‘parallel social realities’ (Lemke, 2004). To expect these to feature prominently in every CDA project would be as unrealistic as it would be misguided. However, complex online multimodalities should at least be considered as possible areas of investigation when research questions are formulated, methods developed, and project designs drawn up.
